So I’ve two new photo sets to share with you, and a question:
- Vancouver Photos. I’ll hopefully add to this album regularly, as I take photos around town. For now, there’s photos from a walkabout I did yesterday, plus a couple from 2 weeks ago.
- Kings of Convenience @ Richard’s on Richards, March 11th, 2005.
So if you go to both, you’ll note the former set is posted as I’ve been doing for ages, here on Tannock.net. The KoC photos I posted at Flickr, to check out how that works. And I really like how Flickr works, for the most part. But I shouldn’t use both my own gallery and Flickr, because that just doubles the work involved in upload and commenting, etc, or if I alternate, leave my photos in different places, which is not so good.
So my question to the public at large is: Should I switch to using Flickr? On the plus-side, it has great tagging/indexing/community features, it’s easy-to-use and is “hip”. On the down-side, it’s not mine, I lose some control of the photos uploaded, there’s the “what if it shuts down, or is sold” factor, and given the volume of photos that I post (which still isn’t alot), I’d probably have to pay to use it, whereas my own gallery is free….Any and all your opinions on the matter are welcome.
stupid Flickr crashes mozilla on my system…
stupid Flickr crashes mozilla on my system…
I’ll count that as a vote against Flickr then 🙂 Is it because of the Flash on Linux thing?
I’ll count that as a vote against Flickr then 🙂 Is it because of the Flash on Linux thing?
I don’t know. I can see flash stuff but maybe it’s a newer version? I have no idea what Flickr looks like at all and I’m morally against booting into windows to see what it’s all about 😉
I don’t know. I can see flash stuff but maybe it’s a newer version? I have no idea what Flickr looks like at all and I’m morally against booting into windows to see what it’s all about 😉